The longer I've been working with legal technology, the more convinced I am that customers should be looking for relationships, not technology or particular solutions.
What do I mean?
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
Topics: Document Automation, Legal Technology, In-House Legal, Legal Automation, Matter Management, Legal Operations, Contract Management
There’s an ongoing debate about whether it’s better to have “point solutions” that only do one thing really well or a single platform that can do nearly everything.
There’s no obvious right answer but here's my thoughts.
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
Topics: Document Automation, Legal Technology, In-House Legal, Document autom, Legal Automation, Matter Management, Legal Operations
If you want to manage your legal matters better, a matter management system should be an excellent investment - if you're prepared to invest the time to set it up and use it properly.
However, if you're really just looking for a better way to use SharePoint and file your emails and documents, a matter management system is a costly way to go about it. There are better options at much lower costs.
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
Topics: Legal Automation, Email Management, Matter Management, Legal Operations
Last week I had a call from a law firm that I first spoke to in June 2016, basically right after LawHawk launched.
The partner at that time told me “Yes, our firm is interested in the use of technology / automation etc in the profession. We have recently invested significant amounts of time (and some money) developing our own precedents and their automation using the Infinity system.”
Now, more than 5 years later, they don’t appear to have made any significant progress. Why not?
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
Topics: Document Automation, Legal Technology, Document Assembly, legal practice, Law Firm Management, Legal Automation
021 339 527
lawhawk@lawhawk.nz
