A common concern we hear when talking to prospective clients about legal automation is that they haven't got a budget, and they don't think they can get one.
Often, however, this is before we have discussed the size and cost of the problem or the opportunity to be addressed and the expected benefits, and therefore, it needs more context before a price can be agreed and a budget could be obtained.
What should you do before worrying about price and budget for an automation project?
Read More
Topics:
Legal Technology,
In-House Legal,
Document Assembly,
Law Firm Management,
Compliance,
Legal Automation,
Matter Management,
Legal Operations,
Contract Management,
Law Firm Profitability
When I’m asked for the best resources to improve overall contracting processes and outcomes, there are two that I can recommend knowing they will provide excellent insights and return on investment.
While particularly relevant for in-house legal teams and contract managers (who can get immediate benefits), they offer significant value to commercial lawyers in law firms who want to understand how they can really add the most value to their clients’ businesses.
Read More
Topics:
Document Automation,
Procurement,
Legal Technology,
In-House Legal,
Document Assembly,
Law Firm Management,
Legal Operations,
Contract Management,
Law Firm Strategy,
Productivity
When evaluating new technology, a proof of concept can be a very helpful way of ensuring you get what you think you are getting while avoiding unnecessary costs.
However, we sometimes see proof-of-concept projects that go off the rails, don’t achieve the expected outcomes, and cost a lot of money.
There is one particular mistake that we frequently see people make.
Read More
Topics:
Document Automation,
Legal Technology,
In-House Legal,
Document Assembly,
Legal Automation,
Matter Management,
Legal Operations,
Contract Management
Because of our focus on document and legal automation, you might expect us to advocate for automating everything, but as with most things, it’s about context.
Automation is great when you have very high volumes, many standard options you need to choose from, and/or details that need to be entered multiple times. In those situations, you can save 75% or more of the drafting time while ensuring that the right clauses are inserted in the correct format. It can get you 90% or more of the way there, allowing you time to add the final 10%.
You don’t need to automate all documents, though.
Read More
Topics:
Document Automation,
Legal Technology,
In-House Legal,
Document Assembly,
Self-Service Legal Automation,
Legal Automation,
Legal Operations,
Contract Management
“A good contract can go in the bottom draw and never be looked at again” was what people said when I started as a lawyer in the 1990s. Contracts were seen as legal documents to be written by lawyers, negotiated by lawyers, and read by other lawyers - if there was a dispute.
Read More
Topics:
Document Automation,
In-House Legal,
Legal Automation,
Legal Operations,
Contract Management
An issue that affects almost every organisation that we have worked with is formatting of their Word templates.
In most cases they are consistently inconsistent and terrible.
It not only reflects badly on the organisation and how the substance of the document may be perceived, but it’s a huge cost as it takes a lot of time for highly paid staff to fix, and refix, formatting each time a document is created.
If you want to automate your documents, its really important to fix your Word styles first. Even if you don't want to automate right now, it's still worth fixing your templates.
Read More
Topics:
Legal Technology,
In-House Legal,
Legal Automation,
Legal Operations,
Contract Management
via GIPHY
A recent series of articles published by Zac de Silva and Mark Fisher touched on issues that we've been observing recently too.
Mark Fisher states, "I've never seen a candidate-short market as extreme as this… and I worked in London through the GFC from 2006 to 2012. It's putting so much pressure on all of us and that's across every single industry, whether it's nursing, retail, hospital, professional services, engineering, tech, digital – every single industry is dramatically short."
It's clearly become very challenging for law firms too, and it will get worse.
The article above contains some great suggestions on better managing retention and staff recruitment.
There's another lever that can also help – technology.
Read More
Topics:
Practise of Law,
Document Automation,
Legal Technology,
In-House Legal,
Document Assembly,
Law Firm Management,
Legal Automation,
Legal Operations
I had two interesting conversations with law firm clients last week.
Both involved scenarios under which our automation would improve an overall business process and result in the law firm needing to do less in generating draft documents.
Neither conversation was based on wanting to pay the lawyers less.
Read More
Topics:
Practise of Law,
Document Automation,
Legal Technology,
In-House Legal,
Law Firm Management,
Legal Automation,
Legal Operations,
Value Pricing
I often talk to in-house lawyers who are unhappy with a technology solution they're using and are looking for a replacement.
When digging deeper, it often appears that they are not using it as intended to be used and are overlooking core features, which is a large part of the issue. Without using it properly, I think it's unfair to make judgements about how good it is, and hard to tell what you need in an alternative.
Read More
Topics:
Document Automation,
Legal Technology,
In-House Legal,
Document Assembly,
Law Firm Management,
Digital Signatures,
Legal Automation,
Email Management,
Legal Operations,
Contract Management